Wednesday, January 29, 2014

LaFontaine's Theory of Color Attraction



While the winter time on the Missouri River still offers solid fishing, I find myself taking more time during these shorter days to read about, think about, and participate in tying flies. I don’t know if it’s cabin fever, but at this time of year, I find myself drawn down into the mysterious undercurrent of the sport and begin to contemplate questions that, dare I say, verge on the theoretical. For instance, why have flies like the Royal Coachman or its more buoyant cousin the Royal Wulff been responsible for so many fish over the decades? These flies don’t imitate any particular hatch or insect. Lee Wulff, the originator of the Royal Wulff, described his invention simply as “strawberry shortcake.” Recently I’ve been rereading what I believe is the best explanation to the effectiveness of this, and many other, attractor flies.

The answer lies in The Dry Fly: New Angles by Gary LaFontaine. In this excellent book, he proposes a Theory of Color Attraction based on two suppositions.

“First, the ‘color’ of the surrounding light affects the intensity of a fly’s color. And second, flies with ‘intense colors’ attract trout (when trout are in the mood to be attracted).”

Let’s take a minute to think about these two statements a little more. We’ve all noticed that the “color” of the surrounding light changes. For instance, at sunrise or sunset, the light takes on an orange or reddish color. When fishing around bankside vegetation, the light takes on a greenish color. When fishing on overcast days, the light takes on a grayish color. Fly patterns that incorporate the same color as the surrounding light will absorb more light and therefore be more intensely colored in the eyes of the fish.

Now, let’s get back to the Royal Coachman/Wulff. This fly has a body or iridescent green peacock herl and a hot spot of red floss in it’s middle. As we all learned in elementary school, the visible spectrum of light (as seen in a rainbow) goes in the order ROY G. BIV: Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Indigo, and Violet. Thus, a fly that incorporates the colors red and green spans the spectrum and has a pretty good chance of one color or the other matching the color of the ambient light. Fish a Royal Wulff around sunrise or sunset and the red hot spot will appear intensely to the fish. Fish a Royal Wulff over a weedy bottom or under streamside vegetation and the green peacock herl will appear more intensely.

So, what’s this mean for anglers on the Missouri River? This is a hatch-matching river, right? A Royal Wulff won’t work here will it? Well, check out this excerpt from Trout Flies: Proven Patterns, another book by Gary Lafontaine published in 1993 in which he describes a pattern of his creation called the Double Wing that is very similar to a Royal Trude:

Frank Obrist, guiding out of Great Falls, wrote, “From 12:00 noon to 4:00 p.m. the Royal Double Wing was the best fly on the Missouri River all summer. My clients racked up more big trout with it than they did even with streamers, fish up to 6 ½ pounds. I kept saying to myself, ‘Maybe it imitates this or maybe it imitates that.’ I couldn’t believe that a pure attractor would work on the Missouri, but finally I had to admit that it did.”

Will a royal attractor pattern work for you this summer? There’s only one way to find out. As the new season approaches, take some time this winter to have some fun and experiment with colors, because learning and experimentation is what makes fly fishing so much fun.

Here is a synthetic royal double wing tied by Parks' Fly Shop
out of Gardiner, MT.


2 comments:

  1. What do you think about some of the new dubbings that incorporate UV colors into the mix? They seem interesting, but I'm also willing to recognize that they be, like a lot of things associated with fly tying, designed to catch more fishermen than fish.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think as of now, I'm inclined to agree with your statement about the new UV materials being designed to catch more fishermen than fish. However, since UV is at the shorter wavelength end of the spectrum, materials that reflect UV light may be visible at greater depth since the UV is better able to penetrate the water column. Me and my buddies have tried some of the new UV materials and caught fish using them, but not noticeably more fish than someone using the same pattern sans UV. For now, I'm keeping an open mind and would love to hear from anyone who is convinced that the new UV stuff does work significantly better.

    ReplyDelete